Goldbod's July to September Report and Matters Arising, SkobaOfficial writes
Introduction
I am just reading that Goldbod has
published its statutory quarterly report in line with the GHANA GOLD BOARD ACT,
2025 (ACT 1140). This spans July to September of 2025. While this has been
applauded, pundits are raising queries with the following conspicuously missing
lines from the report.
What Activists are Saying
They say these are supposed to be at
the heart of every credible report of that nature:
1.There is no financial statement on gold
board’s core mandate, the state-owned monopoly for gold trading, according to
one Alfred Wood.
2.No reference is also made to how much
funding the entity received for its operations. Per how Goldbod report its
financial relationship with Bank of Ghana, it would appear as though the former
is but a service provider or agent to the latter, which is even more curious.
3. There is no profit and loss analysis;
to determine the viability or otherwise of the trade it is doing on our behalf.
This is critical as the the profitability of BOG's gold purchasing program in
the past, has always been a very contentious issue.
My Personal Observations
4. Personally, I thought the report
could be more detailed and nuanced. This looks more like a PR reporting than a
core business mandate operational report that details out critical
financial/operational decision and position of Goldbod. For example, reference
is made to some confiscations, including Gold doré, gold dust, mercury,
firearms, mobile devices, and forged documents. However, the fine details
regarding the value, frequency and culprits were conspicuously missing. Report
of these kinds, should not miss out on some of these fine details.
5. I was equally unimpressed with
Goldbod's traceability strategy. It looks more militant and manual than
technology driven. They had promised to use geofencing and other technology to
better drive responsible sourcing. Seeing that they are resorting to the use of
manual and militant approach leaves me a bit disappointed. I am afraid, this won’t
get us the results we are looking for.
6. Again, on traceability, Goldbod has
recurrently denied buying gold from illegal miners, otherwise known as
galamseyers. To better dispel fears that its gold was irresponsibly sourced,
this report could have been a better opportunity for the Goldbod to list the
names of its trading partners. Aside from stating the number of licenses issued
and how much they have accumulated on same, the report makes no reference to a
single license aggregator or small-scale artisanal miners for verification.
This does not bode well for effective transparency.
7. Given that there is no rigorous
profit and loss analysis, one is unable to determine how profitable their
operations are. When gold prices are skyrocketing by the day and your volumes
of purchases are increasing, your revenue numbers may look good, until the
market tumbles. This is why I agree with activists that Goldbod must begin to
account for the profitability or otherwise of its operations. Just pasting
revenue numbers and shedding light on expenditure (which relates to salaries
and good and services), doesn’t cut it for me. It is as if they interpret
profit as the difference between their revenue and expenditure...This cannot
be.
Conclusion
It is progressive that Goldbod is
complying with its own ACT on reporting. This is critical for transparency and
accountability. This notwithstanding, there should be more detail than we see
with this current report. Alot more of details will help the public better
appreciate the mandate of the Goldbod. Truly, the entity will benefit as this
report becomes credible reference points to their critics. Again, as the fight
against illegal mining intensifies, the advocacy for the entity to provide
comprehensive report on the source of its gold would intensify. I hope they are
ready for that heat. I am looking forward to the deployment of the GEO-fencing
technology and other more technology-oriented approach to ensuring responsible
sourcing.
SkobaCommunications
Marketing Communications Consultancy
0541842198

Comments
Post a Comment